The Sony a7 IV has generally been met with positive reviews, with most praising its nice balance of photo and video capabilities. The a7iii is $2k @ B&H now, and the a7iv is $2500 - so it’s
Yes, the A7II has more dials and buttons, but the A6000 has enough to shoot manual. sidneylopsides • 8 yr. ago. I see the logic here. The control layout on the A7 is much more manual friendly, for example the front and rear dials, you can use those in M a lot quicker than the two rear dials on the a6000.
According to my scale, the a7iii weighs in at roughly 22.9oz (650g), which, while chunky, is still substantially lighter than any sort of DSLR equivalent. And now according to my cheap Home Depot tape measure, the camera is about 5×3.9×3.0 inches (or 12.7×9.5×7.3cm). Once again, a bit larger than any of Sony’s previous cameras, but it’s
Both the a6600 and a7 iii have ibs, that alone would probably help me big time already, as far as I understood it can “compensate” up to 5 stops of light in both models. They both perform better with higher iso than my a6000, but the a7 seems much better than the a6600 according to what I read online.
Yamaneko0624 • 2 yr. ago. I think the a6400 would be better, since it has better autofocus and can shoot 11fps instead of 5fps of the a7ii. If you really want IBIS, you should go with the a7ii, but if you’re mainly taking pictures of cars, I think the better AF and the faster shutter is suitable for your needs.
The Sony α7 IV replaces the Sony α7 III. It has a new, higher-resolution 33-megapixel sensor and improved autofocus system. Physically, the α7 IV is a little bigger and includes two UHS-II SD card slots, one of which has an integrated CFexpress Type A slot and has a fully articulated touchscreen and improved menu system. The α7 III, on the other hand, has two SD card slots, but only one of
. 73 308 448 419 181 279 435 320
sony a7 vs a7ii vs a7iii
